Re: BUG #17946: LC_MONETARY & DO LANGUAGE plperl - BUG
От | Joe Conway |
---|---|
Тема | Re: BUG #17946: LC_MONETARY & DO LANGUAGE plperl - BUG |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 65667857-d2a8-e357-6ba6-45d98a363f61@joeconway.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: BUG #17946: LC_MONETARY & DO LANGUAGE plperl - BUG ("Tristan Partin" <tristan@neon.tech>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 7/3/23 12:25, Tristan Partin wrote: > On Sat Jun 24, 2023 at 8:09 AM CDT, Joe Conway wrote: >> Although I have not looked yet, presumably we could have similar >> problems with plpython. I would like to get agreement on this approach >> against plperl before diving into that though. >> >> Thoughts? > > I don't see anything immediately wrong with this. I think doing a > similar thing for plpython would make sense. Might make sense to CC any > other pl* maintainers too. In our tree there are only plperl and plpython to worry about. "other pl* maintainers" is a fuzzy concept since other pl's are scattered far and wide. I think it is reasonable to expect such maintainers to be paying attention to hackers and pick up on it themselves (I say that as a pl maintainer myself -- plr) -- Joe Conway PostgreSQL Contributors Team RDS Open Source Databases Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: