Re: MS SQL Server compatibility functions
От | Pollard, Mike |
---|---|
Тема | Re: MS SQL Server compatibility functions |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 6418CC03D0FB1943A464E1FEFB3ED46B01B220DD@im01.cincom.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | MS SQL Server compatibility functions (Fredrik Olsson <fredrik.olsson@treyst.se>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
If you're referring to my procedure for newid(), then it was just because of pure laziness; it was an internal proof of concept project, and I was still concentrating on getting it working. Mike Pollard SUPRA Server SQL Engineering and Support Cincom Systems, Inc. --------------------------------Better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to speak out and remove all doubt. Abraham Lincoln -----Original Message----- From: Christopher Kings-Lynne [mailto:chriskl@familyhealth.com.au] Sent: Thursday, November 24, 2005 5:57 AM To: Mario Weilguni Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Pollard, Mike; Bill Bartlett; Fredrik Olsson Subject: Re: [HACKERS] MS SQL Server compatibility functions > Why do you use "GRANT ALL" and not "GRANT SELECT, UPDATE"? All means everybody > can do bad things with those sequences. GRANT ALL on a sequence IS GRANT SELECT & UPDATE. Chris
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: