Re: SCSI disk: still the way to go?
От | Chris Browne |
---|---|
Тема | Re: SCSI disk: still the way to go? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 60zmgxsvrx.fsf@dba2.int.libertyrms.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | SCSI disk: still the way to go? ("Riccardo Inverni" <riccardo.inverni@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: SCSI disk: still the way to go?
|
Список | pgsql-general |
mmoncure@gmail.com ("Merlin Moncure") writes: > Xyratex From their web site, they sound like they'll be as challenging to get straight answers from as any of the other disk array vendors :-(. And there's nothing about what I see there that seems to address anything at all about the "instability hiding in there somewhere" problem. I see no reason at all for a Xyratex FC array to be the slightest bit more stable than any other vendor's product. The only reason I'd be interested is if I knew that their products were priced at some fraction substantially lower than 1/1 of the competing products from EMC, IBM, and such. And it seems pretty clear that that would involve the usual irritating sets of vendor visits and negotiations, which amount to, "No, it's not gonna be cheap." -- output = reverse("gro.gultn" "@" "enworbbc") http://cbbrowne.com/info/sap.html "Note that if I can get you to `su and say' something just by asking, you have a very serious security problem on your system and you should look into it." -- Paul Vixie, vixie-cron 3.0.1 installation notes
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: