Re: replication in Postgres
От | Chris Browne |
---|---|
Тема | Re: replication in Postgres |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 60sl2sd7y3.fsf@dba2.int.libertyrms.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: replication in Postgres ("Jeff Larsen" <jlar310@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
glynastill@yahoo.co.uk (Glyn Astill) writes: > It it possible to get a system that does syncronous replication and > also allows slaves to catch up if they're down for a period of time > like you can with asyncronous? Well, a "modal approach" is possible - that's what Postgres-R tries to do. Of course, once you drop into a mode that "allows slaves to catch up," then you have given up on synchronicity, and have fallen back to asynchronous replication. If you systematically have a way to do that, then you no longer have a replication system that can honestly be called "synchronous." If it's *truly* synchronous, then when nodes fall over, the system MUST stop accepting transactions. -- output = reverse("ofni.secnanifxunil" "@" "enworbbc") http://www3.sympatico.ca/cbbrowne/linux.html Signs of a Klingon Programmer - 2. "Specifications are for the weak and timid!"
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: