Re: replication in Postgres
От | Jeff Larsen |
---|---|
Тема | Re: replication in Postgres |
Дата | |
Msg-id | d1f9b6f00711260714p5f2b47c2td46d3ac7dbee0b8a@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: replication in Postgres (Dave Page <dpage@postgresql.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: replication in Postgres
Re: replication in Postgres Re: replication in Postgres |
Список | pgsql-general |
> Alvaro Herrera wrote: > > Glyn Astill wrote: > >> Thanks everyone for your replies. EnterpriseDB looks like the way to > >> go if we want good replication. > > > > Sorry, this makes no sense to me -- EnterpriseDB has no replication > > solution that I know of. > > Yeah, there is: > > http://www.enterprisedb.com/products/enterprisedb_replication.do Yes, but I'd like something better than "near real time" as the above page describes. Or maybe someone could clarify that.... Besides, EnterpriseDB does not save me enough money. In my current commercial DB, if a transaction is committed on the master, it is guaranteed to be committed to the secondary. In our business, losing one customer order could lose us the customer for good. Jeff
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: