Re: next CommitFest
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: next CommitFest |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 603c8f070911130645t7a264fe3y8f386eccc4e1577d@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: next CommitFest (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: next CommitFest
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 8:47 AM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote: > The docs case is a good example. We do ask people to write docs, but I > don't think we will reject patches if people don't supply docs. I am > not against any of the ideas suggested in this thread --- I am just > pointing out we are heading in a very new direction with the > _requirements_ mentioned. We reject patches for lack of docs all the time. We certainly don't have a policy that the reviewer or committer will write the docs for you if you fail to write them yourself. Sometimes the reviewer or committer will help copy edit, or will revise, but in most cases they won't write them from scratch. Of course, we don't reject such patches PERMANENTLY - people just add the docs and resubmit. ...Robert
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: