Re: next CommitFest
От | Andrew Dunstan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: next CommitFest |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4AFD7290.2050500@dunslane.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: next CommitFest (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: next CommitFest
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas wrote: > On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 8:47 AM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote: > >> The docs case is a good example. We do ask people to write docs, but I >> don't think we will reject patches if people don't supply docs. I am >> not against any of the ideas suggested in this thread --- I am just >> pointing out we are heading in a very new direction with the >> _requirements_ mentioned. >> > > We reject patches for lack of docs all the time. We certainly don't > have a policy that the reviewer or committer will write the docs for > you if you fail to write them yourself. Sometimes the reviewer or > committer will help copy edit, or will revise, but in most cases they > won't write them from scratch. > > Of course, we don't reject such patches PERMANENTLY - people just add > the docs and resubmit. > > > In that case people are working on their own patches. That's quite different from asking/requiring them to work on somebody else's. cheers andrew
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: