Re: "Hot standby"?
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: "Hot standby"? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 603c8f070908111014t64f6bae7sb025545205290dd1@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: "Hot standby"? (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: "Hot standby"?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 1:08 PM, Josh Berkus<josh@agliodbs.com> wrote: > I believe we're just copying Oracle's terminology. While that > terminology is not consistent, it is understood by the industry. Oracle > defined their Hot Standby to have both asynchronous and synchronous modes: > http://www.oracle.com/technology/products/rdb/htdocs/dbms/hotstandby.html I think that you are wrong. Hot Standby is described in that document as a way of replication the database and providing failover in the event that the master dies. This feature has to do with allowing queries to be executed on the slave, which is not discussed in that document. ...Robert
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: