Re: "Hot standby"?
| От | Josh Berkus |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: "Hot standby"? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 4A81A597.1000806@agliodbs.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: "Hot standby"? ("David E. Wheeler" <david@kineticode.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: "Hot standby"?
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Peter, I believe we're just copying Oracle's terminology. While that terminology is not consistent, it is understood by the industry. Oracle defined their Hot Standby to have both asynchronous and synchronous modes: http://www.oracle.com/technology/products/rdb/htdocs/dbms/hotstandby.html The other industry term which would be understood would be "log-based replication". Terms we invent would be less likely to be understood, and users would not get excited about them. Otherwise, I say we go with "simmering follower". ;-) -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL Experts Inc. www.pgexperts.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: