Re: How to get SE-PostgreSQL acceptable
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: How to get SE-PostgreSQL acceptable |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 603c8f070901281935h763ba592o1b67116fb71a01ab@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: How to get SE-PostgreSQL acceptable (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: How to get SE-PostgreSQL acceptable
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 9:27 PM, Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net> wrote: > Robert, > > * Robert Haas (robertmhaas@gmail.com) wrote: >> pg_security (which I really think out to be renamed to >> pg_selinux_context or something, and make a new table if we someday >> support Trusted Solaris or whatever). > > Err, this doesn't really make sense if we're doing row-level security, > that's not something which is tied to SELinux or Trusted Solaris. Of > course, it's likely we'll need such a pg_selinux_context table or > something too.. Or maybe pg_security can be pg_rls instead. Just > wanted to avoid confusion over this point.. Assuming Peter's approach > is the path that is generally agreed upon by core.. I don't think there's anything about pg_security that is specific to row-level security. ...Robert
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: