Re: How to get SE-PostgreSQL acceptable
От | KaiGai Kohei |
---|---|
Тема | Re: How to get SE-PostgreSQL acceptable |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 49812632.8090007@ak.jp.nec.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: How to get SE-PostgreSQL acceptable (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas wrote: > On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 9:27 PM, Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net> wrote: >> Robert, >> >> * Robert Haas (robertmhaas@gmail.com) wrote: >>> pg_security (which I really think out to be renamed to >>> pg_selinux_context or something, and make a new table if we someday >>> support Trusted Solaris or whatever). >> Err, this doesn't really make sense if we're doing row-level security, >> that's not something which is tied to SELinux or Trusted Solaris. Of >> course, it's likely we'll need such a pg_selinux_context table or >> something too.. Or maybe pg_security can be pg_rls instead. Just >> wanted to avoid confusion over this point.. Assuming Peter's approach >> is the path that is generally agreed upon by core.. > > I don't think there's anything about pg_security that is specific to > row-level security. Yes, SELinux requires any objects (not only tuples) to be labeled. The pg_security is also necessary for tables/columns/... Thanks, -- OSS Platform Development Division, NEC KaiGai Kohei <kaigai@ak.jp.nec.com>
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: