Re: FWD: Re: Updated backslash consistency patch
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: FWD: Re: Updated backslash consistency patch |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 603c8f070901151410w32fb832bideaa66c0fa2bed23@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: FWD: Re: Updated backslash consistency patch (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: FWD: Re: Updated backslash consistency patch
Re: FWD: Re: Updated backslash consistency patch |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> 2. You want to write "\df something". Fine, that's not going to show > any system functions anyway, unless there are system functions that are > also selected by "something". If there are, it's not apparent to me why > it's a bad idea to show them; as I've already argued, I think not > showing them is a horrid idea, especially if they are an exact match > that will mask the user-defined function. You seem to be assuming that conflicts between user-defined functions and system functions are a common problem against which users need protection. I have been using PostgreSQL for almost 10 years and am not sure that I've EVER had a problem with this. Maybe once? On the other hand, I want to look at and search my user-defined functions FREQUENTLY. I don't care about the system functions. If I type \df a*, it's not because I want to see all 6 versions of the absolute value function and 61 other functions, it's because I don't want to think hard enough to remember how I spelled the first word in one of my functions that I know starts with "a". I can't imagine why it's reasonable for me to want to see a list of only my own functions, but it's NOT reasonable for me to want to SEARCH the list of only my own functions. ...Robert
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: