Re: FWD: Re: Updated backslash consistency patch
От | Stephen Frost |
---|---|
Тема | Re: FWD: Re: Updated backslash consistency patch |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20090115222148.GP4656@tamriel.snowman.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: FWD: Re: Updated backslash consistency patch (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
* Robert Haas (robertmhaas@gmail.com) wrote: > On the other hand, I want to look at and search my user-defined > functions FREQUENTLY. I don't care about the system functions. If I > type \df a*, it's not because I want to see all 6 versions of the > absolute value function and 61 other functions, it's because I don't > want to think hard enough to remember how I spelled the first word in > one of my functions that I know starts with "a". I have to agree with this in general, to be honest. We use alot of pl/pgsql functions and having the system functions be in \df and be included in '\df a*' searches has really been annoying, not to mention that it's time consuming. I do understand Tom's concern, but I wonder if we could address is in a different way- could we WARN about functions being created which overlap with system functions at CREATE time? I'm pretty sure people don't generally do that on purpose, and if they do, they need to realize they have to treat it specially afterwards to make sure they get their function called.. > I can't imagine why it's reasonable for me to want to see a list of > only my own functions, but it's NOT reasonable for me to want to > SEARCH the list of only my own functions. I would like the ability to search system functions too, I've had occation where that's easier than going to the docs for a particular function, but my impression was that'd be possible through \dfS or something? Thanks, Stephen
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: