> On 05/09/2016 02:04 PM, Gilberto Castillo wrote:
>>
>>> On 05/09/2016 01:58 PM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>>>
>>>> So this is probably just highlighting how I'm not up to date on the
>>>> -advocacy discussion :) But I thought the idea was to have it
>>>> integrated, and that *that* was "the product" in this case. As in the
>>>> "breaker that makes it possible to do transparent upgrades without
>>>> external products". Which I thought was the target for next release,
>>>> not
>>>> this release. But I may be confusing multiple discussion, and as such
>>>> contributing to the confusion.
>>>
>>> Yeah, there's multiple discussions, at least 2:
>>>
>>> 1. Should we promote pglogical in the beta as something to *test*?
>>>
>>> 2. Is pglogical a major-version-making feature?
>>>
>>
>> In my opinion when we have a visual environment full amdinistración
>> included in the core, will be version 10 while not.
>
> That is not in anybody's plans for PostgreSQL. Assuming you mean a GUI?
Yes, Here everything compared to MS-SQLServer and Oracle wise it is topic.
--
Saludos,
Gilberto Castillo
ETECSA, La Habana, Cuba