Re: [MASSMAIL]Re: 9.6 -> 10.0

On 05/09/2016 02:04 PM, Gilberto Castillo wrote:
>
>> On 05/09/2016 01:58 PM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>>
>>> So this is probably just highlighting how I'm not up to date on the
>>> -advocacy discussion :) But I thought the idea was to have it
>>> integrated, and that *that* was "the product" in this case. As in the
>>> "breaker that makes it possible to do transparent upgrades without
>>> external products". Which I thought was the target for next release, not
>>> this release. But I may be confusing multiple discussion, and as such
>>> contributing to the confusion.
>>
>> Yeah, there's multiple discussions, at least 2:
>>
>> 1. Should we promote pglogical in the beta as something to *test*?
>>
>> 2. Is pglogical a major-version-making feature?
>>
>
> In my opinion when we have a visual environment full amdinistración
> included in the core, will be version 10 while not.

That is not in anybody's plans for PostgreSQL.  Assuming you mean a GUI?

--
--
Josh Berkus
Red Hat OSAS
(any opinions are my own)