Re: What's going on with pgfoundry?

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1



- --On Wednesday, November 26, 2008 14:00:59 -0800 "Joshua D. Drake" 
<jd@commandprompt.com> wrote:


> Since were chatting :P. My vote would be to move everything back to port
> 22 and force key based auth only.

How does that work?  Does that kill the script kiddies in their tracks?  I'm 
guessing so, but had never thought to try it ...

How would someone upload their key if they don't have access?  Some sort of web 
interface?  One wouldn't want to throw extra admin overhead if it can be 
avoided ...


- -- 
Marc G. Fournier        Hub.Org Hosting Solutions S.A. (http://www.hub.org)
Email . scrappy@hub.org                              MSN . scrappy@hub.org
Yahoo . yscrappy               Skype: hub.org        ICQ . 7615664
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (FreeBSD)

iEYEARECAAYFAkktyHIACgkQ4QvfyHIvDvPUFwCfbV3QhjxF3kA7szsTeZp5ZIm8
AfUAn3NiwLA9r0hhs3camv4GstIpcJil
=I4+l
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----