Re: What's going on with pgfoundry?
| От | Joshua D. Drake |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: What's going on with pgfoundry? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 1227737562.9359.230.camel@jd-laptop.pragmaticzealot.org обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: What's going on with pgfoundry? ("Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org>) |
| Ответы |
Re: What's going on with pgfoundry?
Re: What's going on with pgfoundry? |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, 2008-11-26 at 18:06 -0400, Marc G. Fournier wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Since were chatting :P. My vote would be to move everything back to port > > 22 and force key based auth only. > > How does that work? Does that kill the script kiddies in their tracks? I'm > guessing so, but had never thought to try it ... > Well they can still talk to the port of course but its irrelevant because unless they have an ssh key, they aren't getting in. Period. > How would someone upload their key if they don't have access? Some sort of web > interface? One wouldn't want to throw extra admin overhead if it can be > avoided ... > See other comment on this. Joshua D. Drake -- PostgreSQL Consulting, Development, Support, Training 503-667-4564 - http://www.commandprompt.com/ The PostgreSQL Company,serving since 1997
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: