Re: Fix for issue RM1336 [pgadmin4]
От | Colin Beckingham |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Fix for issue RM1336 [pgadmin4] |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 5767F4E1.6020308@kingston.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Fix for issue RM1336 [pgadmin4] (Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: Fix for issue RM1336 [pgadmin4]
|
Список | pgadmin-hackers |
On 20/06/16 09:33, Dave Page wrote: > It's not that it's necessarily hard, it's that there are only 24 hours > in the day to get things done. We've got a long list of improvements > to make - some immediate (i.e. in time for betaX - 2 being today in > fact), others for GA and others for future releases. Meanwhile, much > as I'd like to, I cannot keep 10 people assigned to pgAdmin > indefinitely. I do need to get them working on other projects, for > which there are also deadlines. Since pgadmin4 is at the top of the stack browser - window environment - OS - kernel, all of which have their call on some specific set of shortcuts, a couple of thoughts: 1. are there other applications similar to pgadmin which are in the same position where they too are looking for shortcuts? In which case is there a possibility of cross-fertilization of ideas? 2. in the world of software shortcuts, the needs of dependent applications such as pgadmin might not have been foreseen, but is there in the hierarchy a moral obligation to keep a certain subset of combinations free? At the moment it seems like a free for all...
В списке pgadmin-hackers по дате отправления: