Re: Speed up Clog Access by increasing CLOG buffers
От | Jesper Pedersen |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Speed up Clog Access by increasing CLOG buffers |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 57028784.6050107@redhat.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Speed up Clog Access by increasing CLOG buffers (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>) |
Ответы |
Re: Speed up Clog Access by increasing CLOG buffers
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 04/01/2016 04:39 PM, Andres Freund wrote: > On April 1, 2016 10:25:51 PM GMT+02:00, Jesper Pedersen <jesper.pedersen@redhat.com> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On 03/31/2016 06:21 PM, Andres Freund wrote: >>> On March 31, 2016 11:13:46 PM GMT+02:00, Jesper Pedersen >> <jesper.pedersen@redhat.com> wrote: >>> >>>> I can do a USE_CONTENT_LOCK run on 0003 if it is something for 9.6. >>> >>> Yes please. I think the lock variant is realistic, the lockless did >> isn't. >>> >> >> I have done a run with -M prepared on unlogged running 10min per data >> point, up to 300 connections. Using data + wal on HDD. >> >> I'm not seeing a difference between with and without USE_CONTENT_LOCK >> -- >> all points are within +/- 0.5%. >> >> Let me know if there are other tests I can perform > > How do either compare to just 0002 applied? > 0001 + 0002 compared to 0001 + 0002 + 0003 (either way) were pretty much the same +/- 0.5% on the HDD run. Best regards, Jesper
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: