Re: Speed up Clog Access by increasing CLOG buffers
От | Andres Freund |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Speed up Clog Access by increasing CLOG buffers |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 2F91B844-D053-4FC0-A43A-50659DB95719@anarazel.de обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Speed up Clog Access by increasing CLOG buffers (Jesper Pedersen <jesper.pedersen@redhat.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Speed up Clog Access by increasing CLOG buffers
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On April 1, 2016 10:25:51 PM GMT+02:00, Jesper Pedersen <jesper.pedersen@redhat.com> wrote: >Hi, > >On 03/31/2016 06:21 PM, Andres Freund wrote: >> On March 31, 2016 11:13:46 PM GMT+02:00, Jesper Pedersen ><jesper.pedersen@redhat.com> wrote: >> >>> I can do a USE_CONTENT_LOCK run on 0003 if it is something for 9.6. >> >> Yes please. I think the lock variant is realistic, the lockless did >isn't. >> > >I have done a run with -M prepared on unlogged running 10min per data >point, up to 300 connections. Using data + wal on HDD. > >I'm not seeing a difference between with and without USE_CONTENT_LOCK >-- >all points are within +/- 0.5%. > >Let me know if there are other tests I can perform How do either compare to just 0002 applied? Thanks! -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: