Re: NOT EXIST for PREPARE
От | Andreas Karlsson |
---|---|
Тема | Re: NOT EXIST for PREPARE |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 56F4456E.2030309@proxel.se обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: NOT EXIST for PREPARE (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: NOT EXIST for PREPARE
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 03/23/2016 09:10 PM, Stephen Frost wrote: > * Merlin Moncure (mmoncure@gmail.com) wrote: >> No one is arguing that that you should send it any every time (at >> least -- I hope not). > > I'm not sure I follow how you can avoid that though? > > pgbouncer in transaction pooling mode may let a particular connection > die off and then, when you issue a new request, create a new one- which > won't have any prepared queries in it, even though you never lost your > connection to pgbouncer. > > That's why I was saying you'd have to send it at the start of every > transaction, which does add to network load and requires parsing, etc. > Would be nice to avoid that, if possible, but I'm not quite sure how. > > One thought might be to have the server somehow have a pre-canned set of > queries already set up and ready for you to use when you connect, > without any need to explicitly prepare them, etc. Personally I think the right solution would be to add support for prepared statements in pgbouncer, and have pgbouncer run PREPARE as necessary, either after opening a new connection to the database or at the first use of a given prepared statement in a connection. Application level connection poolers with prepared statement support, e.g. sequel for Ruby, does not need any special support from PostgreSQL and work just fine with our current feature set. Andreas
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: