On 3/11/16 1:11 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
>> On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 11:36 AM, David Steele <david@pgmasters.net> wrote:
>>> It looks like a decision needs to be made here whether to apply this patch,
>>> send it back to the author, or reject it so I'm marking it "Ready for
>>> Committer".
>>>
>>> Robert, since you were participating in this conversation can you have a
>>> look?
>
>> Who, me? *looks around*
>>
>> OK, I had a look. I don't think this is a bug.
>
> I agree, and Craig's complaint that this change reduces flexibility
> for plugins seems to tilt the balance against it. I see that Alex
> himself accepted that argument in his last message in the thread
> (<CACACo5Sm-tY-9YijuLbXmcLmSkYtcTaVQh_1j4tADfjC+1-bCw@mail.gmail.com>).
>
> So let's mark it rejected and move on.
+1 and done.
--
-David
david@pgmasters.net