Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 11:36 AM, David Steele <david@pgmasters.net> wrote:
>> It looks like a decision needs to be made here whether to apply this patch,
>> send it back to the author, or reject it so I'm marking it "Ready for
>> Committer".
>>
>> Robert, since you were participating in this conversation can you have a
>> look?
> Who, me? *looks around*
>
> OK, I had a look. I don't think this is a bug.
I agree, and Craig's complaint that this change reduces flexibility
for plugins seems to tilt the balance against it. I see that Alex
himself accepted that argument in his last message in the thread
(<CACACo5Sm-tY-9YijuLbXmcLmSkYtcTaVQh_1j4tADfjC+1-bCw@mail.gmail.com>).
So let's mark it rejected and move on.
> unexpected PQresultStatus: 8
It is a bit annoying that psql doesn't print "COPY_BOTH" here.
But fixing that is not this patch, either.
regards, tom lane