Re: Odd behavior in foreign table modification (Was: Re: Optimization for updating foreign tables in Postgres FDW)
От | Etsuro Fujita |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Odd behavior in foreign table modification (Was: Re: Optimization for updating foreign tables in Postgres FDW) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 569DDECA.7070002@lab.ntt.co.jp обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Odd behavior in foreign table modification (Was: Re: Optimization for updating foreign tables in Postgres FDW) (Etsuro Fujita <fujita.etsuro@lab.ntt.co.jp>) |
Ответы |
Re: Odd behavior in foreign table modification (Was: Re:
Optimization for updating foreign tables in Postgres FDW)
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2016/01/08 14:08, Etsuro Fujita wrote: > On 2016/01/07 21:50, Etsuro Fujita wrote: >> On 2016/01/06 20:37, Thom Brown wrote: >>> I've run into an issue: >>> >>> *# UPDATE master_customers SET id = 22 WHERE id = 16 RETURNING >>> tableoid::regclass; >>> ERROR: >>> CONTEXT: Remote SQL command: UPDATE public.customers SET id = 22 >>> WHERE ((id = 16)) RETURNING NULL > While working on this, I noticed that the existing postgres_fdw system > shows similar behavior, so I changed the subject. > > IIUC, the reason for that is when the local query specifies "RETURNING > tableoid::regclass", the FDW has fmstate->has_returning=false while the > remote query executed at ModifyTable has "RETURNING NULL", as shown in > the above example; that would cause an abnormal exit in executing the > remote query in postgresExecForeignUpdate, since that the FDW would get > PGRES_TUPLES_OK as a result of the query while the FDW would think that > the right result to get should be PGRES_COMMAND_OK, from the flag > fmstate->has_returning=false. > > Attached is a patch to fix that. I added this to the next CF. https://commitfest.postgresql.org/9/483/ Best regards, Etsuro Fujita
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: