Odd behavior in foreign table modification (Was: Re: Optimization for updating foreign tables in Postgres FDW)
От | Etsuro Fujita |
---|---|
Тема | Odd behavior in foreign table modification (Was: Re: Optimization for updating foreign tables in Postgres FDW) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 568F4430.6060805@lab.ntt.co.jp обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Optimization for updating foreign tables in Postgres FDW (Etsuro Fujita <fujita.etsuro@lab.ntt.co.jp>) |
Ответы |
Re: Odd behavior in foreign table modification (Was: Re:
Optimization for updating foreign tables in Postgres FDW)
Re: Odd behavior in foreign table modification (Was: Re: Optimization for updating foreign tables in Postgres FDW) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2016/01/07 21:50, Etsuro Fujita wrote: > On 2016/01/06 20:37, Thom Brown wrote: >> On 25 December 2015 at 10:00, Etsuro Fujita >> <fujita.etsuro@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote: >>> Attached is an updated version of the patch, which is >>> still WIP, but I'd be happy if I could get any feedback. >> I've run into an issue: >> >> *# UPDATE master_customers SET id = 22 WHERE id = 16 RETURNING >> tableoid::regclass; >> ERROR: >> CONTEXT: Remote SQL command: UPDATE public.customers SET id = 22 >> WHERE ((id = 16)) RETURNING NULL > Will fix. While working on this, I noticed that the existing postgres_fdw system shows similar behavior, so I changed the subject. IIUC, the reason for that is when the local query specifies "RETURNING tableoid::regclass", the FDW has fmstate->has_returning=false while the remote query executed at ModifyTable has "RETURNING NULL", as shown in the above example; that would cause an abnormal exit in executing the remote query in postgresExecForeignUpdate, since that the FDW would get PGRES_TUPLES_OK as a result of the query while the FDW would think that the right result to get should be PGRES_COMMAND_OK, from the flag fmstate->has_returning=false. Attached is a patch to fix that. Best regards, Etsuro Fujita
Вложения
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: