Re: [BUGS] ltree::text not immutable?
От | Jim Nasby |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [BUGS] ltree::text not immutable? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 545BE9FD.90700@BlueTreble.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [BUGS] ltree::text not immutable? (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [BUGS] ltree::text not immutable?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 11/5/14, 7:38 PM, Robert Haas wrote: >> Attached is a complete patch along these lines. As I suggested earlier, >> >this just makes the relevant changes in ltree--1.0.sql and >> >pg_trgm--1.1.sql without bumping their extension version numbers, >> >since it doesn't seem important enough to justify a version bump. >> > > I don't understand why you went to all the trouble of building a > versioning system for extensions if you're not going to use it. I was about to dismiss this comment since I don't see any real need for a version bump here, except that AFAIK there's noway to upgrade an extension without bumping the version, other than resorting to hackery. So I think this does need to be an upgrade. :( -- Jim Nasby, Data Architect, Blue Treble Consulting Data in Trouble? Get it in Treble! http://BlueTreble.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: