Re: [BUGS] ltree::text not immutable?
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [BUGS] ltree::text not immutable? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3422.1415311981@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [BUGS] ltree::text not immutable? (Jim Nasby <Jim.Nasby@BlueTreble.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [BUGS] ltree::text not immutable?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Jim Nasby <Jim.Nasby@BlueTreble.com> writes: > On 11/5/14, 7:38 PM, Robert Haas wrote: >> I don't understand why you went to all the trouble of building a >> versioning system for extensions if you're not going to use it. > I was about to dismiss this comment since I don't see any real need for a version bump here, except that AFAIK there'sno way to upgrade an extension without bumping the version, other than resorting to hackery. Well, the one or two users who actually care can fix the problem with a manual ALTER FUNCTION. I'm not sure it's worth making everyone else jump through update hoops. If it hadn't taken us years to even notice the issue, I might be more willing to expend work here, but I really doubt the audience is larger than one or two people ... regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: