Re: Really strange foreign key constraint problem blocking delete
От | Jim Nasby |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Really strange foreign key constraint problem blocking delete |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 5433146C.6010302@BlueTreble.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Really strange foreign key constraint problem blocking delete (Andy Colson <andy@squeakycode.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: Really strange foreign key constraint problem blocking
delete
|
Список | pgsql-general |
On 10/5/14, 10:06 AM, Andy Colson wrote: > On 10/05/2014 10:00 AM, Adrian Klaver wrote: >> On 10/05/2014 07:37 AM, Tim Mickelson wrote: >>> Sorry about that, the precise version is: "PostgreSQL 9.1.9 on >>> x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, compiled by gcc (GCC) 4.4.7 20120313 (Red Hat >>> 4.4.7-3), 64-bit" >> >> Well 9.1 is at .14 now, so on general principles it would be a good idea to upgrade. That being said I do not see anythingin the release notes from .10 to .14 that applies. Though to be truthful I did not read every line. Before upgradingyou could try what Andy suggested which is to REINDEX(tmpautenticazione). See here for the REINDEX caveats, anda way to INDEX CONCURRENTLY: >> >> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.1/interactive/sql-reindex.html >> >>> >>> > > I thought .11 sounded like a good candidate. Especially the part: > > allowing tuples to escape freezing, causing those rows to become invisible once 2^31 transactions have elapsed Those rows should then be invisible to the FK checks as well, so I don't think that's it. My guess is also on a corrupted index. A quick test would be to disable index scans and try the delete again (use EXPLAINANALYZE to make sure the delete is using a sequential scan). If that doesn't work, post EXPLAIN ANALYZE output forthe commands you're running that generate this error. -- Jim Nasby, Data Architect, Blue Treble Data in Trouble? Get it in Treble! http://BlueTreble.com
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: