Re: Really strange foreign key constraint problem blocking delete
От | Andy Colson |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Really strange foreign key constraint problem blocking delete |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 54315E5E.9030902@squeakycode.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Really strange foreign key constraint problem blocking delete (Adrian Klaver <adrian.klaver@aklaver.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Really strange foreign key constraint problem blocking
delete
Re: Really strange foreign key constraint problem blocking delete |
Список | pgsql-general |
On 10/05/2014 10:00 AM, Adrian Klaver wrote: > On 10/05/2014 07:37 AM, Tim Mickelson wrote: >> Sorry about that, the precise version is: "PostgreSQL 9.1.9 on >> x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, compiled by gcc (GCC) 4.4.7 20120313 (Red Hat >> 4.4.7-3), 64-bit" > > Well 9.1 is at .14 now, so on general principles it would be a good idea to upgrade. That being said I do not see anythingin the release notes from .10 to .14 that applies. Though to be truthful I did not read every line. Before upgradingyou could try what Andy suggested which is to REINDEX(tmpautenticazione). See here for the REINDEX caveats, anda way to INDEX CONCURRENTLY: > > http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.1/interactive/sql-reindex.html > >> >> I thought .11 sounded like a good candidate. Especially the part: allowing tuples to escape freezing, causing those rows to become invisible once 2^31 transactions have elapsed -Andy
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: