Re: Remove a unused argument from qual_is_pushdown_safe
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Remove a unused argument from qual_is_pushdown_safe |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 540228.1669644930@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Remove a unused argument from qual_is_pushdown_safe (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>) |
Ответы |
Re: Remove a unused argument from qual_is_pushdown_safe
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> writes: > On Mon, Nov 28, 2022 at 11:54:45AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: >> On Fri, Nov 25, 2022 at 04:05:13PM +0800, Richard Guo wrote: > I wonder if we need to revise the comment atop qual_is_pushdown_safe() > too which says > > * rinfo is a restriction clause applying to the given subquery (whose RTE > * has index rti in the parent query). > > since there is no 'given subquery' after we remove it from the params. > I was thinking about this point, and it seems to me that we could just > do s/the given subquery/a subquery/. But perhaps you have a different > view on the matter? My viewpoint is that this change is misguided. Even if the current coding of qual_is_pushdown_safe doesn't happen to reference the subquery, it might need to in future. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: