Re: DB size and TABLE sizes don't seem to add up
От | Heikki Linnakangas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: DB size and TABLE sizes don't seem to add up |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 53031B18.5060103@vmware.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | DB size and TABLE sizes don't seem to add up (David Wall <d.wall@computer.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: DB size and TABLE sizes don't seem to add up
|
Список | pgsql-performance |
On 02/18/2014 12:14 AM, David Wall wrote: > I am running PG 9.2.4 and I am trying to figure out why my database size > shows one value, but the sum of my total relation sizes is so much less. > > Basically, I'm told my database is 188MB, but the sum of my total > relation sizes adds up to just 8.7MB, which is 1/20th of the reported > total. Where is the 19/20th of my data then? We do make significant > use of large objects, so I suspect it's in there. Is there a relation > size query that would include the large object data associated with any > OIDs in those tables? You can use "select pg_total_relation_size('pg_largeobject')" to get the total size of the large objects. Attributing large objects to the tables that refer them is more difficult. For a single table, something like this: select sum(pg_column_size(lo.data)) from lotest_stash_values t, pg_largeobject lo where lo.loid = t.loid; Replace "lotest_stash_values" with the table's name and lo.loid with the name of the OID column. - Heikki
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: