Re: Standalone synchronous master
От | Joshua D. Drake |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Standalone synchronous master |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 52D077CC.6090308@commandprompt.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Standalone synchronous master (Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Standalone synchronous master
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 01/10/2014 02:33 PM, Andres Freund wrote: > > On 2014-01-10 14:29:58 -0800, Joshua D. Drake wrote: >> db02 goes down. It doesn't matter why. It is down. db01 continues to accept >> orders, allow people to log into the website and we can still service >> accounts. The continuity of service continues. > > Why is that configuration advantageous over a async configuration is the > question. Why, with those requirements, are you using a synchronous > standby at all? If the master goes down, I can fail over knowing that as many of my transactions as possible have been replicated. JD -- Command Prompt, Inc. - http://www.commandprompt.com/ 509-416-6579 PostgreSQL Support, Training, Professional Services and Development High Availability, Oracle Conversion, Postgres-XC, @cmdpromptinc "In a time of universal deceit - telling the truth is a revolutionary act.", George Orwell
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: