Re: Standalone synchronous master
От | Andres Freund |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Standalone synchronous master |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20140110223355.GA13568@awork2.anarazel.de обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Standalone synchronous master ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Standalone synchronous master
Re: Standalone synchronous master Re: Standalone synchronous master |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2014-01-10 14:29:58 -0800, Joshua D. Drake wrote: > db02 goes down. It doesn't matter why. It is down. db01 continues to accept > orders, allow people to log into the website and we can still service > accounts. The continuity of service continues. Why is that configuration advantageous over a async configuration is the question. Why, with those requirements, are you using a synchronous standby at all? Greetings, Andres Freund -- Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: