Re: ECPG FETCH readahead
От | Boszormenyi Zoltan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: ECPG FETCH readahead |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 522B7130.8040006@cybertec.at обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: ECPG FETCH readahead (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: ECPG FETCH readahead
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
2013-09-07 03:25 keltezéssel, Peter Eisentraut írta: > On Wed, 2013-09-04 at 10:06 +0200, Boszormenyi Zoltan wrote: >> 2013-08-17 12:08 keltezéssel, Boszormenyi Zoltan írta: >>> I have put the broken up patchset into a GIT tree of mine at GitHub: >>> https://github.com/zboszor/ecpg-readahead/ >>> but the huge compressed patch is also attached for reference. >> I merged current PG GIT HEAD in the above tree and fixed a merge conflict >> caused by commit 673b527534893a4a8adb3cdef52fc645c13598ce >> >> The huge patch is attached for reference. > The documentation doesn't build: > > openjade:ecpg.sgml:478:8:E: end tag for "LITERAL" omitted, but OMITTAG NO was specified > openjade:ecpg.sgml:477:40: start tag was here > openjade:ecpg.sgml:478:8:E: end tag for "LITERAL" omitted, but OMITTAG NO was specified > openjade:ecpg.sgml:477:20: start tag was here > openjade:ecpg.sgml:478:8:E: end tag for "LITERAL" omitted, but OMITTAG NO was specified > openjade:ecpg.sgml:473:81: start tag was here > openjade:ecpg.sgml:478:8:E: end tag for "LITERAL" omitted, but OMITTAG NO was specified > openjade:ecpg.sgml:473:56: start tag was here Thanks, fixed. Best regards, Zoltán Böszörményi -- ---------------------------------- Zoltán Böszörményi Cybertec Schönig & Schönig GmbH Gröhrmühlgasse 26 A-2700 Wiener Neustadt, Austria Web: http://www.postgresql-support.de http://www.postgresql.at/
Вложения
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: