Re: ECPG FETCH readahead
От | Peter Eisentraut |
---|---|
Тема | Re: ECPG FETCH readahead |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1378517102.7389.2.camel@vanquo.pezone.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: ECPG FETCH readahead (Boszormenyi Zoltan <zb@cybertec.at>) |
Ответы |
Re: ECPG FETCH readahead
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, 2013-09-04 at 10:06 +0200, Boszormenyi Zoltan wrote: > 2013-08-17 12:08 keltezéssel, Boszormenyi Zoltan írta: > > > > I have put the broken up patchset into a GIT tree of mine at GitHub: > > https://github.com/zboszor/ecpg-readahead/ > > but the huge compressed patch is also attached for reference. > > I merged current PG GIT HEAD in the above tree and fixed a merge conflict > caused by commit 673b527534893a4a8adb3cdef52fc645c13598ce > > The huge patch is attached for reference. The documentation doesn't build: openjade:ecpg.sgml:478:8:E: end tag for "LITERAL" omitted, but OMITTAG NO was specified openjade:ecpg.sgml:477:40: start tag was here openjade:ecpg.sgml:478:8:E: end tag for "LITERAL" omitted, but OMITTAG NO was specified openjade:ecpg.sgml:477:20: start tag was here openjade:ecpg.sgml:478:8:E: end tag for "LITERAL" omitted, but OMITTAG NO was specified openjade:ecpg.sgml:473:81: start tag was here openjade:ecpg.sgml:478:8:E: end tag for "LITERAL" omitted, but OMITTAG NO was specified openjade:ecpg.sgml:473:56: start tag was here
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: