Re: [BUGS] BUG #8335: trim() un-document behaviour
От | Vik Fearing |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [BUGS] BUG #8335: trim() un-document behaviour |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 52149734.2030905@dalibo.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [BUGS] BUG #8335: trim() un-document behaviour (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: [BUGS] BUG #8335: trim() un-document behaviour
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 08/14/2013 11:27 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote: > On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 11:31:38PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: >> On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 05:19:30PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: >>> Attached are docs that add the new syntax, and mention it is >>> non-standard; you can see the output here: >>> >>> http://momjian.us/tmp/pgsql/functions-string.html#FUNCTIONS-STRING-SQL >>> >>> We do document three syntaxes for substring() in the same table, one row >>> for each, so there is precedent for doing this. >> Attached is an updated patch with a proper example. I could move the >> extra syntax into the description of the existing trim entry instead. > Patch applied to head. I did not apply this to 9.3 in case we change > our minds about documenting this. This commit introduced the following: doc$ make -s html Processing HTML.index... 2409 entries loaded... collateindex.pl: duplicated index entry found: TRIM 1 entries ignored... Done. -- Vik
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: