Re: [BUGS] BUG #8335: trim() un-document behaviour

On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 11:31:38PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 05:19:30PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Attached are docs that add the new syntax, and mention it is
> > non-standard;  you can see the output here:
> > 
> >     http://momjian.us/tmp/pgsql/functions-string.html#FUNCTIONS-STRING-SQL
> > 
> > We do document three syntaxes for substring() in the same table, one row
> > for each, so there is precedent for doing this.
> 
> Attached is an updated patch with a proper example.  I could move the
> extra syntax into the description of the existing trim entry instead.

Patch applied to head.  I did not apply this to 9.3 in case we change
our minds about documenting this.

--  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
 + It's impossible for everything to be true. +