Re: Backup throttling
| От | Antonin Houska |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Backup throttling |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 51F9788B.70007@gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Backup throttling (Gibheer <gibheer@zero-knowledge.org>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Backup throttling
Re: Backup throttling |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 07/31/2013 07:13 AM, Gibheer wrote:
I don't pretend it's my idea, I just coded it. My boss proposed the feature as such :-)Hi, That is a really nice feature.
Sure, will do in the next version.I took a first look at your patch and some empty lines you added (e.g. line 60 your patch). Can you remove them?
Because both receivelog.c and pg_basebackup.c need it now. I thought I could move localTimestampDifference() and localTimestampDifferenceExceeds() as well for the sake of consistency (these are actually utilities too) but I didn't get convinced enough that the feature alone justifies such a change.Why did you move localGetCurrentTimestamp() into streamutil.c? Is sys/time.h still needed in receivelog.c after the move?
As mentioned in http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20130731173624.GX14652@eldon.alvh.no-ip.org these functions ideally shouldn't have separate implementation at all. However the problem is that pg_basebackup is not linked to the backend.
You're right about sys/time.h, it's included via via streamutil.h. I'll fix that too.
Whenever you have time. Thanks!I will try your patch later today to see, if it works.
// Tony
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: