Re: [GENERAL] pg_upgrade -u
От | Peter Eisentraut |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [GENERAL] pg_upgrade -u |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 51CE5BBE.3010801@gmx.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [GENERAL] pg_upgrade -u (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: [GENERAL] pg_upgrade -u
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 6/28/13 9:43 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote: > On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 09:15:31PM -0400, Peter Eisentraut wrote: >> On 6/28/13 6:06 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote: >>> On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 09:44:00AM -0400, Peter Eisentraut wrote: >>>> On 5/28/13 10:55 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote: >>>>> Wow, I never realized other tools used -U for user, instead of -u. >>>>> Should I change pg_upgrade to use -U for 9.4? I can keep supporting -u >>>>> as an undocumented option. >>>> >>>> It seems to me that that option shouldn't be necessary anyway. >>>> pg_upgrade should somehow be able to find out by itself what the >>>> superuser of the old cluster was. >>> >>> Uh, any idea how to do that? >> >> select rolname from pg_authid where oid = 10; > > Uh, how do I know what username to connect as to issue that query? single-user mode?
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: