Re: spoonbill vs. -HEAD
От | Stefan Kaltenbrunner |
---|---|
Тема | Re: spoonbill vs. -HEAD |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 5151FE1B.7040505@kaltenbrunner.cc обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: spoonbill vs. -HEAD (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: spoonbill vs. -HEAD
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 03/26/2013 08:45 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan@kaltenbrunner.cc> writes: >> I finally started to investigate why spoonbill stopped reporting to the >> buildfarm feedback about 2 months ago. >> It seems that the foreign-keys locking patch (or something commity very >> close to January 23th) broke it in a fairly annoying way - running the >> buildfarm script seems to >> consistently "stall" during the isolationtester part of the regression >> testing leaving the postgresql instance running causing all future >> buildfarm runs to fail... > > It looks from here like the isolationtester client is what's dropping > the ball --- the backend states are unsurprising, and two of them are > waiting for a new client command. Can you get a stack trace from the > isolationtester process? https://www.kaltenbrunner.cc/files/isolationtester.txt Stefan
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: