Re: spoonbill vs. -HEAD
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: spoonbill vs. -HEAD |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 18421.1364327149@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | spoonbill vs. -HEAD (Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan@kaltenbrunner.cc>) |
Ответы |
Re: spoonbill vs. -HEAD
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan@kaltenbrunner.cc> writes: > I finally started to investigate why spoonbill stopped reporting to the > buildfarm feedback about 2 months ago. > It seems that the foreign-keys locking patch (or something commity very > close to January 23th) broke it in a fairly annoying way - running the > buildfarm script seems to > consistently "stall" during the isolationtester part of the regression > testing leaving the postgresql instance running causing all future > buildfarm runs to fail... It looks from here like the isolationtester client is what's dropping the ball --- the backend states are unsurprising, and two of them are waiting for a new client command. Can you get a stack trace from the isolationtester process? regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: