Re: plruby: rb_iterate symbol clash with libruby.so
От | Pavel Raiskup |
---|---|
Тема | Re: plruby: rb_iterate symbol clash with libruby.so |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 5127122.UsUPqPCgps@nb.usersys.redhat.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: plruby: rb_iterate symbol clash with libruby.so (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: plruby: rb_iterate symbol clash with libruby.so
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tuesday, November 6, 2018 7:28:21 PM CET Tom Lane wrote: > I wrote: > > Yeah. The long and short of this is that we're trampling on namespace > > that reasonably belongs to Ruby --- if they had some functions named > > "pg_something" and complained about a collision with libpq, would we > > change? Nope. So really we should rename these. > > > Barring objections I'll go make this happen shortly. > > Done. I realized that the immediate problem, rb_iterate(), was only > added as of PG v10, which may explain why we hadn't heard complaints > about this till now. So I've made the change only as far back as v10. > In principle we could change the rbtree code in 9.5/9.6 as well, but > I think that's more likely to create problems than fix any. The 'rb_iterate' seems to exist at least in REL9_2_STABLE branch, so it is probably much older. No need to backpatch of course -- just saying. That said, I'm still not sure how this could work before ... Maybe it has not been working for some time. Pavel
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: