Re: plruby: rb_iterate symbol clash with libruby.so
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: plruby: rb_iterate symbol clash with libruby.so |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 25954.1541600731@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: plruby: rb_iterate symbol clash with libruby.so (Pavel Raiskup <praiskup@redhat.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: plruby: rb_iterate symbol clash with libruby.so
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Pavel Raiskup <praiskup@redhat.com> writes: > On Tuesday, November 6, 2018 7:28:21 PM CET Tom Lane wrote: >> Done. I realized that the immediate problem, rb_iterate(), was only >> added as of PG v10, which may explain why we hadn't heard complaints >> about this till now. So I've made the change only as far back as v10. > The 'rb_iterate' seems to exist at least in REL9_2_STABLE branch, so it is > probably much older. Oh! Hmm ... I think I jumped to conclusions when the part of my patch that touched struct RBTreeIterator failed to apply. But you're right, rb_iterate has been there since 9.0 now that I look more carefully. So we really ought to back-patch further. However: > That > said, I'm still not sure how this could work before ... Maybe it has not > been working for some time. Yeah, I'm now mighty confused about this as well. PL/Ruby is pretty old too, so how come nobody noticed this before? Is its rb_iterate call in someplace that hardly gets any use? regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: