Re: Bug, Feature, or what else?
От | Adrian Klaver |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Bug, Feature, or what else? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 51151E5F.70906@gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Bug, Feature, or what else? (Andreas Kretschmer <andreas@a-kretschmer.de>) |
Ответы |
Re: Bug, Feature, or what else?
|
Список | pgsql-general |
On 02/08/2013 07:45 AM, Andreas Kretschmer wrote: > >> >> If I am following the Notes section correctly in: >> >> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.1/interactive/sql-revoke.html >> >> "If a superuser chooses to issue a GRANT or REVOKE command, the command >> is performed as though it were issued by the owner of the affected >> object. Since all privileges ultimately come from the object owner >> (possibly indirectly via chains of grant options), it is possible for a >> superuser to revoke all privileges, but this might require use of >> CASCADE as stated above." >> >> >> Try: >> >> revoke all on schema public from ak02 cascade; > > Yeah, i read that before, but doesn't help: > > > > db115150=# revoke all on schema public from ak02 cascade; > REVOKE > db115150=# drop user ak02; > FEHLER: kann Rolle »ak02« nicht löschen, weil andere Objekte davon abhängen > DETAIL: Privilegien für Schema public > > > Strange, isn't it? Well I got left is: REVOKE PUBLIC FROM ak02; > > > Andreas > > -- Adrian Klaver adrian.klaver@gmail.com
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: