Re: Bug, Feature, or what else?
От | Andreas Kretschmer |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Bug, Feature, or what else? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1000342202.25103.1360338334505.JavaMail.open-xchange@ox.ims-firmen.de обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Bug, Feature, or what else? (Adrian Klaver <adrian.klaver@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Bug, Feature, or what else?
|
Список | pgsql-general |
> > If I am following the Notes section correctly in: > > http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.1/interactive/sql-revoke.html > > "If a superuser chooses to issue a GRANT or REVOKE command, the command > is performed as though it were issued by the owner of the affected > object. Since all privileges ultimately come from the object owner > (possibly indirectly via chains of grant options), it is possible for a > superuser to revoke all privileges, but this might require use of > CASCADE as stated above." > > > Try: > > revoke all on schema public from ak02 cascade; Yeah, i read that before, but doesn't help: db115150=3D# revoke all on schema public from ak02 cascade; REVOKE db115150=3D# drop user ak02; FEHLER: kann Rolle =C2=BBak02=C2=AB nicht l=C3=B6schen, weil andere Objekt= e davon abh=C3=A4ngen DETAIL: Privilegien f=C3=BCr Schema public Strange, isn't it? Andreas
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: