Re: Can the string literal syntax for function definitions please be dropped ?
| От | Timothy Madden |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Can the string literal syntax for function definitions please be dropped ? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 5078d8af0910251512i53dc1c4cnf290fd07496b8dc@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Can the string literal syntax for function definitions please be dropped ? (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Can the string literal syntax for function
definitions please be dropped ?
|
| Список | pgsql-general |
On Sun, Oct 25, 2009 at 11:40 PM, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> wrote:
Timothy Madden escribió:Sadly, we don't have standards-conformant SQL/PSM. Right now, we have a
> Just like when I write C++ applications I use standards-conforming
> C++, when I write SQL applications I would like to use
> standard-conforming SQL.
lot of different languages for functions, none of them mandated by SQL,
and there is no reason to create a syntax exception for any of them.
I am sure that when we get SQL/PSM support, the interest in getting
standards-conformant procedure creation statements is going to get a lot
higher.
PL/pgSQL is not SQL/PSM.
Anyway Posgres offers a CREATE FUNCTION statement that resembles or should
resemble that in the standard, and that is what I am talking about. I just want the
Postgres version of the statement to look more like the standard one.
Would you detail the differences you talk about that you see here ?
Thank you,
Timothy Madden
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: