Re: Can the string literal syntax for function definitions please be dropped ?
От | Alvaro Herrera |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Can the string literal syntax for function definitions please be dropped ? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20091025224209.GB5516@alvh.no-ip.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Can the string literal syntax for function definitions please be dropped ? (Timothy Madden <terminatorul@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Can the string literal syntax for function definitions
please be dropped ?
|
Список | pgsql-general |
Timothy Madden escribió: > Anyway Posgres offers a CREATE FUNCTION statement that resembles or should > resemble that in the standard, and that is what I am talking about. "Should" being the operative word in that sentence. If you want to submit a patch to move us closer towards the SQL/PSM goal, I'm sure it will be welcome. > I just want the Postgres version of the statement to look more like > the standard one. Sure. If we weren't all pointing in that general direction, we would probably have CONNECT BY instead of WITH RECURSIVE. > Would you detail the differences you talk about that you see here ? I'm not that familiar with SQL/PSM, sorry. Pavel Stehule is da man. -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: