Re: CREATE SCHEMA IF NOT EXISTS
От | Andrew Dunstan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: CREATE SCHEMA IF NOT EXISTS |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 506B4D86.10306@dunslane.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: CREATE SCHEMA IF NOT EXISTS (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: CREATE SCHEMA IF NOT EXISTS
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 10/02/2012 03:48 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> writes: >> Excerpts from David E. Wheeler's message of mar oct 02 16:16:37 -0300 2012: >>> On Oct 2, 2012, at 12:08 PM, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: >>>> create schema if not exists foo create table first (a int); >>>> create schema if not exists foo create table second (a int); >>>> >>>> As far as I can see, with the patch as it currently stands, you would >>>> end up with only table "first" in the schema, which seems very >>>> surprising to me. >>> Yeah, I think the second should die. CINE should only work if there are no other objects created as part of the statement,IMHO. >> Well, if that's the rationale then you end up with no schema foo at all >> (i.e. both die), which seems even more surprising (though I admit it has >> the advantage of being a simple rule to document.) > I think we should just disallow putting any contained objects in the > statement when IF NOT EXISTS is used. It's simple to understand, simple > to document and implement, and I think it covers all the sane use-cases > anyway. > > I thought we'd already agreed on this. +1. cheers andrew
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: