Re: CREATE SCHEMA IF NOT EXISTS
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: CREATE SCHEMA IF NOT EXISTS |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 25156.1349207313@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: CREATE SCHEMA IF NOT EXISTS (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: CREATE SCHEMA IF NOT EXISTS
Re: CREATE SCHEMA IF NOT EXISTS |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> writes: > Excerpts from David E. Wheeler's message of mar oct 02 16:16:37 -0300 2012: >> On Oct 2, 2012, at 12:08 PM, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: >>> create schema if not exists foo create table first (a int); >>> create schema if not exists foo create table second (a int); >>> >>> As far as I can see, with the patch as it currently stands, you would >>> end up with only table "first" in the schema, which seems very >>> surprising to me. >> Yeah, I think the second should die. CINE should only work if there are no other objects created as part of the statement,IMHO. > Well, if that's the rationale then you end up with no schema foo at all > (i.e. both die), which seems even more surprising (though I admit it has > the advantage of being a simple rule to document.) I think we should just disallow putting any contained objects in the statement when IF NOT EXISTS is used. It's simple to understand, simple to document and implement, and I think it covers all the sane use-cases anyway. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: