Re: Proof of concept: standalone backend with full FE/BE protocol
От | Josh Berkus |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Proof of concept: standalone backend with full FE/BE protocol |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 504E1C71.6000801@agliodbs.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Proof of concept: standalone backend with full FE/BE protocol (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Proof of concept: standalone backend with full
FE/BE protocol
Re: Proof of concept: standalone backend with full FE/BE protocol |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> The point of the proposal that I am making is to have a simple, > low-maintenance solution for people who need a single-application > database. A compromise somewhere in the middle isn't likely to be an > improvement for anybody. For instance, if you want to have additional > connections, you open up a whole collection of communication and > authentication issues, which potential users of a single-application > database don't want to cope with. Yes, exactly. In fact, most of the folks who would want an embedded PostgreSQL either want no authentication at all, or only a single password. So supporting authentication options other than trust or md5 is not required, or desired AFAIK. -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL Experts Inc. http://pgexperts.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: